E.R. Charchyan
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
D.G. Breshenkov
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Yu.V. Belov
Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Hybrid aortic repair in patients with type III aortic dissection and concomitant proximal aortic lesion
Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(9): 28‑37
Views: 4808
Downloaded: 182
To cite this article:
Charchyan ER, Breshenkov DG, Belov YuV. Hybrid aortic repair in patients with type III aortic dissection and concomitant proximal aortic lesion. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery.
2020;(9):28‑37. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202009128
To report our own experience of hybrid treatment using FET technique in patients with type A aortic dissection and concomitant lesion of aortic arch and ascending aorta.
There were 90 (28,3%) FET procedures for the period from January 2010 to August 2019. Type B aortic dissection was diagnosed in 19 (45,2%) patients. Type B aortic dissection combined with aortic arch aneurysm occurred in 11 (58%) cases, ascending aorta aneurysm — 15 (79%) cases. Patients underwent total arch and ascending aorta replacement via median sternotomy (upper partial J-shaped sternotomy in 3 cases). Valve-sparing interventions were performed in 58% of cases (aortic root repair — 6 (32%) patients, David procedure — 5 (26%) cases). Intraoperative features, early postoperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality were retrospectively analyzed. In long-term period, distal aortic remodeling, survival rate and incidence of redo interventions were evaluated.
Mean CPB time was 166±27 min, aortic cross-clamping time — 93±23 min, duration of circulatory arrest — 43±11 min. Neurological complications and paraplegia were absent. In-hospital mortality was absent. Reversible acute renal failure without need for hemodialysis developed in 2 cases (11%). Two patients underwent repeated intervention (TEVAR) due to dSINE and negative aortic remodeling. Annual survival rate was 100%. Freedom from redo aortic surgery was 89,5%.
FET surgery is an adequate alternative treatment for type B aortic dissection combined with lesion of aortic arch and ascending aorta. This approach ensures a one-stage repair in patients with contraindications to TEVAR. Unlike thoracotomy, FET procedure is valuable for simultaneous correction of cardiac and proximal aortic lesion, stabilizing the distal segments of dissected aorta. This is obvious advantage of this technique.
Keywords:
Authors:
E.R. Charchyan
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
D.G. Breshenkov
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Yu.V. Belov
Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Received:
17.01.2020
Accepted:
10.02.2020
List of references:
Close metadata
Email Confirmation
An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.
Email Confirmation
Log in to the site using your account in one of the services
We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.