Сайт издательства «Медиа Сфера»
содержит материалы, предназначенные исключительно для работников здравоохранения. Закрывая это сообщение, Вы подтверждаете, что являетесь дипломированным медицинским работником или студентом медицинского образовательного учреждения.

Atoche J.E.

Частный университет Антенор Оррего

Caballero-Alvarado J.

Частный университет Антенор Оррего;
Региональная больница Трухильо

Lozano-Peralta K.

Частный университет Антенор Оррего

Zavaleta-Corvera C.

Частный университет Антенор Оррего

Диагностические шкалы острого аппендицита у детей

Авторы:

Atoche J.E., Caballero-Alvarado J., Lozano-Peralta K., Zavaleta-Corvera C.

Подробнее об авторах

Просмотров: 303

Загрузок: 47


Как цитировать:

Atoche J.E., Caballero-Alvarado J., Lozano-Peralta K., Zavaleta-Corvera C. Диагностические шкалы острого аппендицита у детей. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2024;(10):80‑87.
Atoche JE, Caballero-Alvarado J, Lozano-Peralta K, Zavaleta-Corvera C. Diagnostic scales for acute appendicitis in children. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(10):80‑87. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202410180

Рекомендуем статьи по данной теме:
Фак­то­ры, свя­зан­ные с дли­тель­ным пре­бы­ва­ни­ем в ста­ци­она­ре пос­ле ап­пен­дэк­то­мии во вре­мя пан­де­мии SARS-CoV-2. Хи­рур­гия. Жур­нал им. Н.И. Пи­ро­го­ва. 2023;(10):47-52
Сов­ре­мен­ные ас­пек­ты, влияющие на так­ти­ку ве­де­ния па­ци­ен­тов с па­пил­ляр­ным ра­ком щи­то­вид­ной же­ле­зы. Хи­рур­гия. Жур­нал им. Н.И. Пи­ро­го­ва. 2023;(12):89-94
Ком­плексное хи­рур­ги­чес­кое ле­че­ние ре­ци­ди­ви­ру­юще­го пос­тинъек­ци­он­но­го аб­сцес­са на фо­не сис­тем­но­го ауто­им­мун­но­го за­бо­ле­ва­ния. Хи­рур­гия. Жур­нал им. Н.И. Пи­ро­го­ва. 2023;(12):123-133
Кли­ни­ко-мор­фо­ло­ги­чес­кая оцен­ка ис­сле­до­ва­ния кра­ев ре­зек­ции при ра­ке мо­лоч­ной же­ле­зы пос­ле под­кож­ной/ко­же­сох­ран­ной мас­тэк­то­мии с ре­конструк­ци­ей. Он­ко­ло­гия. Жур­нал им. П.А. Гер­це­на. 2023;(5):20-24
Фун­кци­ональ­ные ре­зуль­та­ты хи­рур­ги­чес­ко­го ле­че­ния с эн­доп­ро­те­зи­ро­ва­ни­ем у боль­ных с опу­хо­ле­вым по­ра­же­ни­ем кос­тей вер­хней ко­неч­нос­ти. Он­ко­ло­гия. Жур­нал им. П.А. Гер­це­на. 2023;(5):25-33
Ана­то­ми­чес­кие пре­дик­то­ры клас­си­чес­кой нев­рал­гии трой­нич­но­го нер­ва. Рос­сий­ский жур­нал бо­ли. 2023;(4):5-10
Кли­ни­чес­кие осо­бен­нос­ти и сов­ре­мен­ные ди­аг­нос­ти­чес­кие кри­те­рии за­бо­ле­ва­ния, ас­со­ци­иро­ван­но­го с ан­ти­те­ла­ми к гли­коп­ро­те­ину оли­го­ден­дро­ци­тар­но­го ми­ели­на. Жур­нал нев­ро­ло­гии и пси­хи­ат­рии им. С.С. Кор­са­ко­ва. 2023;(11):47-56
По­тен­ци­ал МР-спек­трос­ко­пии в ди­аг­нос­ти­ке ког­ни­тив­но­го сни­же­ния у по­жи­лых. Жур­нал нев­ро­ло­гии и пси­хи­ат­рии им. С.С. Кор­са­ко­ва. 2023;(11):105-110
Ана­лиз ре­зуль­та­тов хи­рур­ги­чес­ко­го ле­че­ния це­реб­раль­ных анев­ризм в ос­тром пе­ри­оде кро­во­из­ли­яния у па­ци­ен­тов со сте­пенью тя­жес­ти Hunt—Hess IV—V в ФГАУ «На­ци­ональ­ный ме­ди­цин­ский ис­сле­до­ва­тельский центр ней­ро­хи­рур­гии им. акад. Н.Н. Бур­ден­ко» за 2006—2020 гг.. Жур­нал «Воп­ро­сы ней­ро­хи­рур­гии» име­ни Н.Н. Бур­ден­ко. 2023;(6):5-13
Прог­нос­ти­чес­кая цен­ность эзо­фа­го­гас­тро­ду­оде­нос­ко­пии в ам­бу­ла­тор­ных ус­ло­ви­ях для ди­аг­нос­ти­ки эози­но­филь­но­го эзо­фа­ги­та у де­тей. До­ка­за­тель­ная гас­тро­эн­те­ро­ло­гия. 2023;(4):5-10

Introduction

Acute appendicitis remains one of the most common medical emergencies worldwide, and its standard treatment is appendectomy. Its maximum incidence occurs between the second and third decade of life [1], which underlines its relevance in the child population. It is estimated that between 1% and 8% of children who come to the emergency room with acute abdominal pain are diagnosed with this condition [2]. Despite its frequency, diagnosis in children can be challenging [3].

For a certain diagnosis, in addition to the clinical history, physical examination and laboratory tests, an abdominal ultrasound must be performed [4]. However, sometimes advanced diagnostic tools are not available and it is necessary to resort to predictive clinical scales. Among these, the Alvarado scale, the pediatric appendicitis scale, and the inflammatory response to appendicitis scale stand out [5]. All are based on clinical and laboratory findings to categorize patients as low, moderate or high risk, facilitating a timely diagnosis.

It is essential to consider acute appendicitis when evaluating abdominall pain in children, as missing it can result in serious health consequences and legal implications. Although several clinical scoring systems exist, there is still no consensus on the exact criteria for its diagnosis, presenting a challenge for emergency professionals. This review aims to identify, detail and analyze all the scales used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.

Methods

An exhaustive literature search was carried out following the orderly and systematized approach recommended by the PRISMA guideline. First, a precise search expression was developed: («Children» OR «child» OR «pediatric patient*») AND («scale*» OR «score» OR «scoring system» OR «clinical prediction score» OR «clinical prediction model» OR «calculator») AND («appendicitis» OR «acute appendicitis» OR «appendectomy»). This expression was used to search articles in the PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases. The execution of this search was carried out on August 11, 2023, with the purpose of identifying the various scales that can be used for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population.

The documents recovered from each of the databases were imported into the Rayyan software, which was used in various stages of the process. In the first stage, duplicates were identified and eliminated. Subsequently, a preliminary review was carried out based on the titles and abstracts of the articles. Finally, a more detailed evaluation was carried out by completely reviewing the selected texts.

The inclusion criteria were established based on the population studied, restricting the selection exclusively to pediatric patients, and those studies that used appendicitis risk scales that integrated various parameters to determine a risk score and a clinical management recommendation were considered. On the other hand, research that involved an adult population and that used indices in isolation, without complementing them with other data for diagnosis, was excluded.

In total, a total of 1521 documents were identified during the search process. After completing the screening process, it was possible to identify 73 articles that met the previously established selection criteria; Of all of them, it was possible to identify 22 prediction scales used for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.

Development

Epidemiology of AA in children

Acute appendicitis currently continues to be one of the most common surgical pathologies in the population, and pediatric patients are no exception. In fact, although it usually occurs more frequently in the second decade of life, in pediatric patients it can represent up to 16% of all emergencies, having an overall incidence of around 10% for children and 8% for girls [6], so obviously making an early diagnosis is essential to provide adequate management of the pathology and thus prevent it from progressing to more severe stages.

Pathophysiology of acute appendicitis

The onset of appendiceal pathology is through obstruction of its lumen, the main cause of which in the general population is the impaction of fecaliths; however, in the case of children, the first cause is lymphoid hyperplasia. Other less common causes may include impacted stools and cecal or appendicular tumors [7].

Obstruction of the appendiceal lumen initially causes a congestive phase in which distension and inflammation of the appendix occurs, which in turn causes lymphatic and venous obstruction, then the suppurative or phlegmonous phase appears, in which bacterial proliferation of The area, mainly caused by Gram negatives such as E. coli, subsequently follows the necrotic or gangrenous phase in which an obstruction of arterial flow has occurred, becoming an ideal environment for the proliferation of anaerobic bacteria with a predominance of Bacteroides fragilis and causing ischemia. visceral that will finally lead to the perforation phase in which the appendix has spilled its contents into the peritoneal cavity, thus becoming the main complication of acute appendicitis [7, 8].

Diagnosis

Although the treatment of acute appendicitis is well established, which is through surgical removal of the anatomical piece, the diagnosis usually presents certain difficulties, especially in the pediatric population. This is because the clinical presentation of appendicitis in children usually differs from the presentation in adults. In particular, children often may not express classic symptoms such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, etc.; and they may even manifest other unusual symptoms, making early diagnosis difficult and causing an increase in the rate of complications as a result of delayed diagnosis, with rates of up to 30% reported for perforated appendicitis [9].

The decision whether or not to operate on pediatric patients has not only led to a high rate of perforated appendicitis, but also an increase in the rate of negative appendectomies from around 20% to 54% [7, 10].

Currently, although the Gold standard for diagnosis is histopathology, this cannot be performed until after removing the appendix, so the best way to diagnose acute appendicitis is through different elements such as an adequate clinical history, physical examination, as well as laboratory and image studies, for this reason, for many years predictive scales for appendicitis in children have been implemented that unify these elements and, by obtaining a score, provide a guide to guide the decision to perform or not. a surgical intervention.

Some of these scales are relatively simple to apply, since they only include clinical and laboratory data (Table 1), others that are a little more complex use indices or mathematical formulas (Table 2) and there are others that complement not only clinical and laboratory data., but also imaging studies such as ultrasound (Table 3). These scales assign values to each of the variables they include, to subsequently obtain a score, which is accompanied by a recommendation for patient management. The most used scales worldwide are the Alvarado and Tzanakis scales, PAS. and Heidelberg Appendicitis Score (HAS), the first two being initially created for a more generalized population, while the other two are specific for pediatric patients [10].

Table 1. Clinical and laboratory scores for pediatric acute appendicitis

Predictor

ALV

ALV mod

PAS

PAS mod

APPE

AIR

LINTULA

RIPASA

SAMUEL

SHERA

LINDBERG mod

OHMAN

Age (Years)

≤6

0

7—11

(+1)

≥12

(+0.5)

<40

0

(+1)

≥40

0

(+0.5)

<50

0

(+1.5)

Gender

Male

(+2)

(+2)

(+1)

(+8)

Female

0

0

(+0.5)

(–8)

Duration of symptoms

≤12 horas.

(+1)

13—24 horas.

(+1.5)

<24 horas.

(+3)

25—48 horas.

(+0.5)

0

≤48 horas.

(+1)

≥49 horas.

0

(+0.5)

(–12)

Anorexy

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

Nausea—vomiting

Yes

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+3.5)

(+1)

(+2)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+7)

No

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(–5)

Fever

Yes

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+3)

(+1)

(+1)

(+7)

No

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(–9)

Table 1. Clinical and laboratory scores for pediatric acute appendicitis. (Continuation)

Predictor

ALV

ALV mod

PAS

PAS mod

APPE

AIR

LINTULA

RIPASA

SAMUEL

SHERA

LINDBERG mod

OHMAN

Absence of bowel sounds

(+4)

Migration of pain to LRQ

Yes

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+4)

(+0.5)

(+1)

(+1)

(+4)

(+1)

No

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

(–11)

0

Pain progression

Yes

(+3)

No

(–4)

Constant pain

Yes

(–10)

(+1.5)

No

0

0

Pain in LRQ

Yes

(+2)

(+2)

(+2)

(+2)

(+1.5)

(+1)

(+4)

(+0.5)

(+2)

(+2)

No

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

LRQ Tenderness

(+1)

(+4.5)

Pain intensity in LRQ

Mild

0

Moderade

0

Severe

(+2)

Pain in DIC when coughing, jumping or percussing

(+2)

(+2)

(+2)

(+2)

Pain outside the LRQ

Yes

(–6)

No

(+4)

Rebound pain (blumberg)

Yes

(+1)

(+1)

(+4)

(+7)

(+1)

(+5)

(+2.5)

No

0

0

0

0

0

(–10)

0

Mild

(+1)

Moderade

(+2)

Severe

(+3)

Rovsing

(+2)

Abdominal rigidity or guarding

Yes

(+4)

(+2)

(+15)

(+1)

No

0

0

(–4)

0

WBC

≥10 mil

(+2)

(+2)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

≤10 mil/uL

0

10—15 mil/uL

(+1)

(+1)

>15 mil/uL

(+3)

(+2)

<12 mil/uL

(–15)

12—20 mil/uL

(+2)

>20 MIL/uL

(+10)

Deviation to the left

(+1)

(+1)

(+1)

Neutrophils

≤75%

0

(+1)

>75%

(+2)

0

Polymorphonuclear

70—84%

(+1)

>85%

(+2)

Table 1. Clinical and laboratory scores for pediatric acute appendicitis. (Ending)

Predictor

ALV

ALV mod

PAS

PAS mod

APPE

AIR

LINTULA

RIPASA

SAMUEL

SHERA

LINDBERG mod

OHMAN

CRP (g/L)

≤0.01

0

0.01—0.06

(+2)

>0.06

(+1.5)

10—49

(+1)

≥50

(+2)

Negative urine test

(+1)

No urinary symptoms

(+2)

Foreign citizen

(+1)

Note. ALV: Alvarado, mod: modified, PAS: pediatric appendicitis score, APPE: pediatric appendicitis score, AIR: appendicitis inflammatory response, (): Points, Mod: Modified, LRQ: Lower Right Quadrant, WBC: White Blood Cells.

Table 2. Scores for pediatric appendicitis with formulas or indices

Predictor

DIPAS

pARC

AUB

ESKELINE

Neutrophil—lymphocyte ratio (NLR)

<2.57

(0)

≥2.57

(1)

Platelet—lymphocyte ratio (PLI) Í

<1.14

(0)

≥1.14

(1)

Lymphocyte—monocyte ratio (LMI)

<0.42

(0)

≥0.42

(1)

CRP (g/L)

<0.5

(0)

≥0.5

(1)

Leukocyte count for age

Positive

(4)

Negative

(0)

Gender

Male

1.2780

Female

0

Age according to sex

M>13 o F>11

0

F: 3—7

0.3810

F: 8—11

0.6513

M: 3—7

–0.06653

M: 8—13

–0.654

ANC: (Neutrophils, %×leukocytes, cells ·1000)/100)

<14 mil cel/uL

1.7734×√ANC

≥14 mil cel/uL

6.6195

Table 2. Scores for pediatric appendicitis with formulas or indices. (Ending)

Predictor

DIPAS

pARC

AUB

ESKELINE

Duration of pain

<24 h

0

24—48 h

0.4696

48—96 h

0.1003

>96 h

0

<48 h

2

≥48 h

1

Abdominal defense (stiffness)

Yes

0.6736

2

No

0

1

Pain in LRQ

Yes

1.1435

1

2

No

0

0

In another side

1

Migration of pain to DIC

0.4557

Constant pain

Yes

1

No

0

Pain on percussion of DIC

Yes

1

2

No

0

1

Pain when walking or jumping

1.0494

Pain on Rebound (blumberg)

Yes

2

No

1

WBC

>10 mil/uL

2

<10 mil/uL

1

LRG/Creatinine

Leucine rich alpha—2—glycoprotein/creatinine

Formula

e–0.615+1.1x/(1+e–0.615+1.1x)

x: –8.6855+values per variable

y=−2.669+1.604∙constant pain+ +0.943∙pain on DIC+ +1.540∙pain on percussion+ +0.384∙LRG/Creatinine (g/mol)

x=(pain in DIC×11.41)+ +(stiffness×6.62)+ +(leukocytes×5.88)+ +(blumberg×4.25)+ +(pain on percussion of DIC×3.51)+ +(duration of pain×2.13)

Note. CRP: C-Reactive Protein, M: Male, F: Female, H: Hours, ANC: Absolute Neutrophil Count, WBC: White blood cells, LRG: Leucine-Rich alpha-2-Glycoprotein.

Table 3. Scores for pediatric appendicitis with imaging studies

Predictor

TZANAKIS

HEIDELBERG

HEIDELBERG

modificado

AI (artificial intelligence)

BIDIAP

PUAS+PAS

Pain in RLQ

4

1

1

2

Rebound pain

3

1

1

1

Continuous pain

1

Pain in RLQ when coughing, percussing or jumping

2

Pain migration to RLQ

1

Anorexy

1

Fever

1

Nausea or vomiting

1

Leukocytosis

2

1

1

1

Deviation to the left

1

CRP>20 mg/dL

1

1

US compatible con apendicitis

6

1

1

1

Diámetro apendicular (mm)

7—8

1

>8

2

(A) Appendicular diameter ≥6.9 mm

4

Non-compressible appendix

2

Presence of appendicolith

1

Presence of inflammatory changes

1

Presence of liquid

1

Presence of hyperemia or vascular abnormality

1

Observation of large lymph nodes

1

Observation of abnormal intestinal loops

1

(B) SII ≥890

SII=(ANC×APC)/ALC

3

(C) Presence of peritoneal irritation

2

Note. RLQ: right lower quadrant, PUAS: pediatric ultrasound appendicitis score, PAS: pediatric appendicitis score, SII: systemic immune inflammation index, ANC: absolute neutrophil count, APC: absolute platelet count, ALC: absolute lymphocyte count.

Final considerations

At the end of this narrative review, we realize that we currently have up to 22 acute appendicitis scales in pediatric patients, consequently, the question arises about which one to choose; Thus, we consider it appropriate to mention that the choice of a scale will depend not only on its high diagnostic performance, but also on the availability of auxiliary imaging and laboratory tests to satisfy its criteria, this being an individual factor for each Health establishments. Thus, there are scale options that mostly only require a good history and physical examination and other more complex ones that use imaging studies, urine tests, acute phase reactants, indices, formulas, etc.

Ethical aspects: All authors certify that they meet the current authorship criteria of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).

Funding Sources: The authors declare that this work has not received any funding from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Author Contributions:

Elías Atoche J, Caballero-Alvarado J: Conceptualization, Formal research analysis, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Approval of the final manuscript.

Elías Atoche J, Caballero-Alvarado J, Lozano-Peralta K, Zavaleta-Corvera C: Writing, Review and editing, Approval of the final manuscript.

Подтверждение e-mail

На test@yandex.ru отправлено письмо со ссылкой для подтверждения e-mail. Перейдите по ссылке из письма, чтобы завершить регистрацию на сайте.

Подтверждение e-mail



Мы используем файлы cооkies для улучшения работы сайта. Оставаясь на нашем сайте, вы соглашаетесь с условиями использования файлов cооkies. Чтобы ознакомиться с нашими Положениями о конфиденциальности и об использовании файлов cookie, нажмите здесь.