Искусственные интеллектуальные системы в развитии вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий

Закрыть метаданные

Рекомендуем статьи по данной теме:

Роль гистероскопии в диагностике маточной патологии при бесплодии у пациенток с семейной средиземноморской лихорадкой. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2024;(2):74-80

Первый опыт использования технологии искусственного интеллекта в системе CAD EYE при колоноскопии у детей. (Серия клинических случаев). Доказательная гастроэнтерология. 2024;(1):94-100

Разработка и тестирование новых методических подходов прогнозирования сердечно-сосудистых событий у здоровых людей с использованием технологии машинного обучения на базе международного исследования «Интерэпид». Профилактическая медицина. 2024;(3):72-79

Искусственный интеллект в патологической анатомии. Архив патологии. 2024;(2):65-71

Роль телемедицины в дерматологии с примерами по организации услуг пациентам с псориазом и акне. Клиническая дерматология и венерология. 2024;(2):111-117

Роль межгенных взаимодействий в формировании перинатальных осложнений гестационного сахарного диабета у беременных после вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Проблемы репродукции. 2024;(2):51-61

Предикторы успеха экстракорпорального оплодотворения с криопереносом у пациенток с хроническим эндометритом по данным лазерного конверсионного тестирования. Проблемы репродукции. 2024;(2):62-73

Точность приложения на основе искусственного интеллекта при выявлении хронических заболеваний вен классов C1 и C2. Флебология. 2024;(2):132-138

Влияние технологий искусственного интеллекта на длительность проведения двойного чтения маммографических исследований. Профилактическая медицина. 2024;(5):32-37

В условиях быстрого развития компьютерных технологий непрерывно расширяется область применения систем искусственного интеллекта (ИИ). В течение последних десятилетий программы ИИ активно разрабатываются и интегрируются в различные сферы здравоохранения с увеличением числа и сложности решаемых ими задач. Благодаря возможности анализировать большой набор данных и высокой производительности применение ИИ является перспективным направлением в повышении точности и скорости диагностики, выборе тактики лечения и его объективизации, возможностей индивидуального прогнозирования. Программы вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий (ВРТ) представляют собой последовательность этапов, на эффективность каждого из которых оказывает влияние совокупность многих факторов. В связи с этим актуальным является применение систем ИИ в преодолении бесплодия, описанных для различных аспектов лечения, включая индивидуальный подбор схем стимуляции и мониторинга ответа яичников, отбор гамет, эмбрионов и их криоконсервацию, неинвазивную диагностику генетического статуса эмбриона, прогноз эффективности циклов ВРТ. Данный обзор литературы подготовлен на основании анализа публикаций баз данных PubMed, MedLine, eLibrary за период 1972—2022 гг. по ключевым словам Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning в области репродуктивной медицины и эмбриологии и описывает основные методы ИИ, применяемые на всех этапах программ ВРТ.

ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ

Технологии ИИ являются перспективным направлением повышения качества оказания медицинской помощи при бесплодии, перехода к персонифицированной медицине и повышению эффективности программ ВРТ. Разработка систем ИИ требует участия специалиста медицинского профиля в отборе и подготовке данных, определении задач алгоритма, его апробации и внедрения в клиническую практику. Необходимо отметить, что системы ИИ также могут применяться в области медицинских научных исследований. Однако до интеграции алгоритмов ИИ необходимы масштабные рандомизированные контролируемые испытания и их стандартизация, что сопряжено с решением ряда этических, законодательных и организационных вопросов.

Ключевые слова:

искусственный интеллект

машинное обучение

репродуктивная медицина

бесплодие

вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии

оценка ооцитов

оценка сперматозоидов

селекция эмбрионов

Авторы:

Беспалова О.Н.

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт акушерства, гинекологии и репродуктологии им. Д.О. Отта»

ORCID: 0000-0002-6542-5953

Коган И.Ю.

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт акушерства, гинекологии и репродуктологии им. Д.О. Отта»

ORCID: 0000-0002-7351-6900

Загайнова В.А.

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт акушерства, гинекологии и репродуктологии им. Д.О. Отта»

ORCID: 0000-0001-6971-7024

Шенгелия М.О.

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт акушерства, гинекологии и репродуктологии им. Д.О. Отта»

ORCID: 0000-0002-0103-8583

Жернакова Т.С.

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт акушерства, гинекологии и репродуктологии им. Д.О. Отта»

ORCID: 0000-0002-5131-4363

Пачулия О.В.

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт акушерства, гинекологии и репродуктологии им. Д.О. Отта»

ORCID: 0000-0003-4116-0222

Комарова Е.М.

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт акушерства, гинекологии и репродуктологии им. Д.О. Отта» Минобрнауки России

ORCID: 0000-0002-9988-9879

Лесик Е.А.

ORCID: 0000-0003-1611-6318

Тапильская Н.И.

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт акушерства, гинекологии и репродуктологии им. Д.О. Отта»

ORCID: 0000-0001-5309-0087

Дата поступления:

22.12.2023

Дата принятия в печать:

24.12.2023

Список литературы:

Mintz Y, Brodie R. Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol. 2019;28:2:73-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1575882
Сухих Г.Т., Давыдов Д.Г., Логинов В.В., Баев О.Р., Приходько А.М., Шешко Е.Л., Чмыхова Е.В. Состояние и перспективы внедрения технологий искусственного интеллекта в акушерско-гинекологическую практику. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021;2:5-12. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.2.5-12
Nash FA. Differential diagnosis: an apparatus to assist the logical faculties. The Lancet. 1954;263:6817:874-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(54)91437-3
De Dombal FT, Leaper DJ, Staniland JR, McCann AP, Horrocks JC. Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Br Med J. 1972;2:5804:9-13.
Riegler MA, Stensen MH, Witczak O, Andersen JM, Hicks SA, Hammer HL, Delbarre E, Halvorsen P, Yazidi A, Holst N., Haugen TB. Artificial intelligence in the fertility clinic: status, pitfalls and possibilities. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:9:2429-2442. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab168
Ившин А.А., Багаудин Т.З., Гусев А.В. Искусственный интеллект на страже репродуктивного здоровья. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021;5:17-24. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.5.17-24
Wang R, Pan W, Jin L, Li Y, Geng Y, Gao C, Chen G, Wang H, Ma D, Liao S. Artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine. Reproduction. 2019;158:4:R139-R154. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-18-0523
Deng L, Yu D. Deep learning: methods and applications. Foundations and Trends R in Signal Processing. 2014;7:3-4:197-387. https://doi.org/10.1561/2000000039
Riordon J, Sovilj D, Sanner S, Sinton D, Young EWK. Deep learning with microfluidics for biotechnology. Trends Biotech. 2019;37:3:310-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.08.005
Assadi A, Laussen PC, Goodwin AJ, Goodfellow S, Dixon W, Greer RW, Jegatheeswaran A, Singh D, McCradden M, Gallant SN, Goldenberg A, Eytan D, Mazwi ML. An integration engineering framework for machine learning in healthcare. Frontiers in Digital Health. 2022;4:932411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.932411
Wang A, Xiu X, Liu S, Qian Q, Wu S. Characteristics of Artificial Intelligence Clinical Trials in the Field of Healthcare: A Cross-Sectional Study on ClinicalTrials. gov. Int J Environment Res Public Health. 2022;19:20:13691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013691
Coudray N, Ocampo PS, Sakellaropoulos T, Narula N, Snuderl M, Fenyö D, Moreira AL, Razavian N, Tsirigos A. Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nature Medicine. 2018;24:10:1559-1567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0177-5
Hesamian MH, Jia W, He X, Kennedy P. Deep learning techniques for medical image segmentation: achievements and challenges. J Digital Imag. 2019;32:4:582-596. https://doi.org/10.1038/10.1007/s10278-019-00227-x
Hernandez IH, Guijarro JT, Belda C, Urena A, Salcedo I, Espinosa-Anke L, Saggion H. Savana: re-using electronic health records with artificial intelligence. Int J Interactive Multimedia Artificial Intelligence. 2018;4:7:8-12. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.03.001
Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, Saito K, Maeda Y, Matsuda S, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Kitagawa Y. Automated surgical-phase recognition for robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy using artificial intelligence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29:11:6847-6855. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11996-1
Lee DH, Yoon SN. Application of artificial intelligence-based technologies in the healthcare industry: Opportunities and challenges. Int J Environmental Research Public Health. 2021;18:1:271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010271
Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, Kalyane D, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discovery Today. 2021;26:1:80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.010
Brocklehurst P. A study of an intelligent system to support decision making in the management of labour using the cardiotocograph — the INFANT study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:1:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0780-0
Lee KS, Ahn KH. Artificial Neural Network analysis of spontaneous preterm labor and birth and its major determinants. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34:16:e128. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e128
Jhee JH, Lee S, Park Y, Lee SE, Kim YA, Kang SW, Kwon JY, Park JT. Prediction model development of late-onset preeclampsia using machine learning-based methods. PLoS One. 2019;14:8:e0221202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221202
Wright A, Wright D, Syngelaki A, Georgantis A, Nicolaides KH. Two-stage screening for preterm preeclampsia at 11—13 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220:2:197.e1-197.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.092
Bertini A, Salas R, Chabert S, Sobrevia L, Pardo F. Using Machine learning to predict complications in pregnancy: A systematic review. Front Bioengineering Biotechnol. 2022;9:1385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.780389
Iftikhar P, Kuijpers MV, Khayyat A, Iftikhar A, DeGouvia De Sa M. Artificial intelligence: a new paradigm in obstetrics and gynecology research and clinical practice. Cureus. 2020;12:2.e7124. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7124
Collins F. Using artificial intelligence to detect cervical cancer. NIH Director’s Blog. 2019;17. [Internet]. https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2019/01/17/using-artificial-intelligence-to-detect-cervical-cancer/
Moawad G., Tyan P., Louie M. Artificial intelligence and augmented reality in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31:5:345-348. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000559
Raimundo JM, Cabrita P. Artificial intelligence at assisted reproductive technology. Procedia Computer Scie. 2021;181:442-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.189
Marino A, Gullo S, Sammartano F, Volpes A, Allegra A. Algorithm-based individualization methodology of the starting gonadotropin dose in IVF/ICSI and the freeze-all strategy prevent OHSS equally in normal responders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the evidence. J Assisted Reprod Genet. 2022;1583-1601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02503-2
Yovich JL, Alsbjerg B, Conceicao JL, Hinchliffe PM, Keane KN. PIVET rFSH dosing algorithms for individualized controlled ovarian stimulation enables optimized pregnancy productivity rates and avoidance of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Drug Design, Development Ther. 2016;10:2561. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S104104
Jeong HG, Kim SK, Lee JR, Jee BC. Correlation of oocyte number with serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels measured by either Access or Elecsys in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles. Clin Exper Reprod Med. 2022;49:3:202-209. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2022.05211
Baker VL, Gracia C, Glassner MJ, Schnell VL, Doody K, Coddington CC, Shin SS, Marshall LA, Alper MM, Morales AJ, Pavone ME, Behera MA, Zbella EA, Shapiro BS, Straseski JA, Broyles DL. Multicenter evaluation of the Access AMH antimüllerian hormone assay for the prediction of antral follicle count and poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:3:506-513. e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.031
Wang X, Jin L, Mao YD, Shi JZ, Huang R, Jiang YN, Zhang CL, Liang XY. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve Tests and Age in the Prediction of Poor Ovarian Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation — A Real-World Data Analysis of 89,002 Patients. Front endocrinol. 2021;12:702061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.702061
Lee Y, Kim TH, Park JK, Eum JH, Lee HJ, Kim J, Lyu SW, Kim YS, Lee WS, Yoon TK. Predictive value of antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone: Which is better for live birth prediction in patients aged over 40 with their first IVF treatment? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;221:151-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.047
Zeng R, Chen H, Zeng X, Qin L. The Essential role of body weight in adjusting Gn dosage to prevent high ovarian response for women with PCOS during IVF: A Retrospective study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:922044. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.922044
Letterie G, Mac Donald A. Artificial intelligence in in vitro fertilization: a computer decision support system for day-to-day management of ovarian stimulation during in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:5:1026-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.006
Letterie G, MacDonald A, Shi Z. An artificial intelligence platform to optimize workflow during ovarian stimulation and IVF: process improvement and outcome-based predictions. Reprod BioMed Online. 2022;44:2:254-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.10.006
Chen Z, Wang Z, Du M, Liu Z. Artificial intelligence in the assessment of female reproductive function using ultrasound: a review. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41:6:1343-1353. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15827
Liang X, Fang J, Li H, Yang X, Ni D, Zeng F, Chen Z. CR-unet-Based ultrasonic follicle monitoring to reduce diameter variability and generate area automatically as a novel biomarker for follicular maturity. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46:11:3125-3134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.020
Matsubayashi H, Kitaya K, Takaya Y, Nishiyama R, Yamaguchi K, Kim N, Sakaguchi K, Doshida M, Takeuchi T, Ishikawa T. Identification of empty follicles or oocyte-containing follicles by ultrasound images using K-means method and principal component analysis assessing several parameters with artificial intelligence. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:302-302.
Liang X, Liang J, Zeng F, Lin Y, Li Y, Cai K, Ni D, Chen Z. Evaluation of oocyte maturity using artificial intelligence quantification of follicle volume biomarker by three-dimensional ultrasound. Reprod BioMed Online. 2022;45:6:1197-1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.07.012
Park H, Lee HJ, Kim HG, Ro YM, Shin D, Lee SR, Kim SH, Kong M. Endometrium segmentation on transvaginal ultrasound image using key‐point discriminator. Med physics. 2019;46:9:3974-3984. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13677
Hu SY, Xu H, Li Q, Telfer BA, Brattain LJ, Samir AE. Deep learning-based automatic endometrium segmentation and thickness measurement for 2D transvaginal ultrasound. 2019; 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE. 2019;993-997. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856367
Oluborode B, Burks H, Craig LB, Peck JD. Does the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium during treatment with assisted reproductive technologies influence pregnancy outcomes? Hum Fertil. 2022;25:1:166-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2020.1757766
Kuijsters NPM, Methorst WG, Kortenhorst MSQ, Rabotti C, Mischi M, Schoot BC. Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35:1:50-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.019
Zhu L, Che HS, Xiao L, Li YP. Uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer affects the chance of clinical pregnancy in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:6:1238-1243. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu058
Nanni L, Lumini A, Manna C. A data mining approach for predicting the pregnancy rate in human assisted reproduction. Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Healthcare 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2010;97-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16095-0_6
Kushnir VA, Darmon SK, Shapiro AJ, Albertini DF, Barad DH, Gleicher N. Utilization of third-party in vitro fertilization in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:3:266. e1-266. e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.11.1022
de Santiago I, Polanski L. Data-Driven Medicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility. J Clin Med. 2022;11:21:6426. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216426
Pai HD, Baid R, Palshetkar NP, Pai A, Pai RD, Palshetkar R. Oocyte cryopreservation-current scenario and future perspectives: A narrative review. J Hum Reprod Scie. 2021;14:4:340. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_173_21
Letort G, Eichmuller A, Da Silva C, Nikalayevich E, Crozet F, Salle J, Minc N, Labrune E, Wolf JP, Terret ME, Verlhac MH. An interpretable and versatile machine learning approach for oocyte phenotyping. J Cell Scie. 2022;135:13:jcs260281. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260281
Peschansky C, Patel S, Amir J, Dynia S, Usmani S, Lynn R, Louden, E. Picture perfect: Determining the clinical utilization of artificial intelligence in oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:3:e157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.424
Sanche Gonzalez D, Flores-Saiffe A, Valencia-Murillo R, Mendizabal-Ruiz G, Chavez-Badiol A. Machine learning predicting oocyte’s fertilization and blastocyst potential based on morphological features. Hum Reprod.. 2021;36:246-247.
Weng L, Lee GY, Liu J, Kapur R, Toth TL, Toner M. On-chip oocyte denudation from cumulus — oocyte complexes for assisted reproductive therapy. Lab Chip. 2018;18:24:3892-3902. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8lc01075g
Iwasaki W, Yamanaka K, Sugiyama D, Teshima Y, Briones-Nagata MP, Maeki M, Yamashita K, Takahashi M, Miyazaki M. Simple separation of good quality bovine oocytes using a microfluidic device. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:1:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32687-6
Zhai R, Shan G, Dai C, Hao M, Zhu J, Ru C, Sun Y. Automated Denudation of Oocytes. Micromachines. 2022;13:8:1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13081301
Kruger TF, DuToit TC, Franken DR, Acosta AA, Oehninger SC, Menkveld R, Lombard CJ. A new computerized method of reading sperm morphology (strict criteria) is as efficient as technician reading. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:1:202-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55640-4
Riordon J, McCallum C, Sinton D. Deep learning for the classification of human sperm. Computers Biol Med. 2019;111:103342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103342
Movahed RA, Mohammadi E, Orooji M. Automatic segmentation of Sperm’s parts in microscopic images of human semen smears using concatenated learning approaches. Computers Biol Med. 2019;109:242-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.032
Ilhan HO, Serbes G, Aydin N. Automated sperm morphology analysis approach using a directional masking technique. Computers Biol Med. 2020;122:103845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103845
Javadi S, Mirroshandel SA. A novel deep learning method for automatic assessment of human sperm images. Computers Biol Med. 2019;109:182-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.030
Hicks SA, Andersen JM, Witczak O, Thambawita V, Halvorsen P, Hammer HL, Haugen TB, Riegler MA. Machine learning-based analysis of sperm videos and participant data for male fertility prediction. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:1:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53217-y
Goodson SG, White S, Stevans AM, Bhat S, Kao CY, Jaworski S, Marlowe TR, Kohlmeier M, McMillan L, Zeisel SH, O’Brien DA. CASAnova: a multiclass support vector machine model for the classification of human sperm motility patterns. Biol Reprod. 2017;97:5:698-708. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/iox120
Gunderson SJ, Puga Molina LC, Spies N, Balestrini PA, Buffone MG, Jungheim ES, Riley J, Santi CM. Machine-learning algorithm incorporating capacitated sperm intracellular pH predicts conventional in vitro fertilization success in normospermic patients. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:4:930-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.10.038
Wang Y, Riordon J, Kong T, Xu Y, Nguyen B, Zhong J, You JB, Lagunov A, Hannam TG, Jarvi K, Sinton D. Prediction of DNA integrity from morphological parameters using a single‐sperm DNA fragmentation index assay. Advanced Scie. 2019;6:15:1900712. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900712
McCallum C, Riordon J, Wang Y, Kong T, You JB, Sanner S, Lagunov A, Hannam TG, Jarvi K, Sinton D. Deep learning-based selection of human sperm with high DNA integrity. Communications Biol. 2019;2:1:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0491-6
Quinn MM, Jalalian L, Ribeiro S, Ona K, Demirci U, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:8:1388-1393. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey239
Quinn MM, Ribeiro S, Juarez-Hernandez F, Simbulan RK, Jalalian L, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Microfluidic preparation of spermatozoa for ICSI produces similar embryo quality to density-gradient centrifugation: a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2022;37:7:1406-1413. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac099
Costa-Borges N, Giralt G, Albó E, Alvarez A, Ramos J, Hernandez I, Munne S. O-122 ICSI in a box: development of a successful automated sperm injection robot with external supervision and minimal manual intervention. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:Supplement_1:deab126. 047. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab126.047
Адамян Л.В. Использование искусственного интеллекта в репродуктивной медицине. Проблемы репродукции. 2021;27:3:6-13. https://doi.org/10.17116/repro2021270316
Сухих Г.Т., Скибина Ю.С., Занишевская А.А., Шувалов А.А., Янчук Н.О., Грязнов А.Ю., Сысоева А.П., Макарова Н.П., Валиахметова Э.З., Калинина Е.А., Лепилин П.А. Применение волоконно-оптических методов и искусственного интеллекта в диагностике эякулята мужчин с бесплодием в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2021;7:74-80. https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.7.74-80
Dimitriadis I, Zaninovic N, Badiola AC, Bormann CL. Artificial intelligence in the embryology laboratory: a review. Reprod BioMed Online. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.003
Zaninovic N, Irani M, Meseguer M. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy? Fertil Ster. 2017;108:5:722-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.002
Pandian Z, Gibreel A, Bhattacharya S. In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015;11:CD003357. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub4
Bori L, Paya E, Alegre L, Viloria TA, Remohi JA, Naranjo V, Meseguer M. Novel and conventional embryo parameters as input data for artificial neural networks: an artificial intelligence model applied for prediction of the implantation potential. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:6:1232-1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.023
Dimitriadis I, Bormann CL, Kanakasabapathy MK, Thirumalaraju P, Gupta R, Pooniwala R, Shafiee H. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) for assessment and selection of normally fertilized human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:3:e272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.805
Coticchio G, Fiorentino G, Nicora G, Sciajno R, Cavalera F, Bellazzi R, Zuccotti M. Cytoplasmic movements of the early human embryo: imaging and artificial intelligence to predict blastocyst development. Reprod BioMed Online. 2021;42:3:521-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.12.008
Kanakasabapathy MK, Thirumalaraju P, Bormann CL, Gupta R, Pooniwala R, Kandula H, Shafiee H. Deep learning mediated single time-point image-based prediction of embryo developmental outcome at the cleavage stage. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.08346. 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.08346
Singh A, Au J, Saeedi P, Havelock J. Automatic segmentation of trophectoderm in microscopic images of human blastocysts. IEEE Transactions Biomed Engineering. 2014;62:1:382-393. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2356415
Kheradmand S, Singh A, Saeedi P, Au J, Havelock J. Inner cell mass segmentation in human HMC embryo images using fully convolutional network. 2017. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE. 2017;1752-1756. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2017.8296582
Rad RM, Saeedi P, Au J, Havelock J. Multi-resolutional ensemble of stacked dilated u-net for inner cell mass segmentation in human embryonic images. 2018 25th IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE. 2018;3518-3522. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451750
Saeedi P, Yee D, Au J, Havelock J. Automatic identification of human blastocyst components via texture. IEEE Transactions Biomed Engineering. 2017;64:12:2968-2978. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2017.2759665
Kheradmand S, Saeedi P, Bajic I. Human blastocyst segmentation using neural network. 2016 IEEE Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering (CCECE). IEEE. 2016;1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2016.7726763
Rad RM, Saeedi P, Au J, Havelock J. BLAST-NET: Semantic segmentation of human blastocyst components via cascaded atrous pyramid and dense progressive upsampling, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE. 2019;1865-1869. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2019.8803139
Mushtaq A, Mumtaz M, Raza A, Salem N, Yasir MN. Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection of Human Embryo Components for Assisted Reproduction by In Vitro Fertilization. Sensors. 2022;22:19:7418. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197418
Miyagi Y, Habara T, Hirata R, Hayashi N. Feasibility of deep learning for predicting live birth from a blastocyst image in patients classified by age. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18:2:190-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12266
VerMilyea MD, Hall JM, Perugini D, Murphy AP, Ngyuen T, Rios C, Perugini M. Artificial intelligence: non-invasive detection of morphological features associated with abnormalities in chromosomes 21 and 16. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:3:e237-e238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1366
Meyer A, Dickinson J, Kelly N, Kandula H, Kanakasabapathy M, Thirumalaraju P, Shafiee H. Can deep convolutional neural network (CNN) be used as a non-invasive method to replace preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)? Hum Reprod. 2020;35:I238-I238.
Chavez-Badiola A, Flores-Saiffe-Farías A, Mendizabal-Ruiz G, Drakeley AJ, Cohen J. Embryo Ranking Intelligent Classification Algorithm (ERICA): artificial intelligence clinical assistant predicting embryo ploidy and implantation. Reprod BioMed Online. 2020;41:4:585-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.07.003
Kato K, et al. Do existing embryo selection models based on artificial intelligence, morphokinetic, or morphology models correlate with blastocyst euploidy? Reprod BioMed Online. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.09.010
Jiang VS, Kandula H, Thirumalaraju P, Kanakasabapathy MK, Cherouveim P, Souter I, Dimitriadis I, Bormann CL, Shafiee H. The use of voting ensembles and patient characteristics to improve the accuracy of deep neural networks as a non-invasive method to classify embryo ploidy status. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:3:e155-e156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.421
Miwa A, Noguchi Y, Hosoya K, Mori Y, Sato T, Kasahara Y, Hidaka M, Hayashi H. Equivalent clinical outcome after vitrified‐thawed blastocyst transfer using semi‐automated embryo vitrification system compared with manual vitrification method. Reprod Med Biol. 2020;19:2:164-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12320
Hajek J, Baron R, Sandi-Monroy N, Schansker S, Schoepper B, Depenbusch M, Schultze-Mosgau A, Neumann K, Gagsteiger F, von Otte S, Griesinger G. A randomised, multi-center, open trial comparing a semi-automated closed vitrification system with a manual open system in women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:8:2101-2110. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab140
Arav A, Natan Y, Kalo D, Komsky-Elbaz A, Roth Z, Levi-Setti PE, Leong M, Patrizio P. A new, simple, automatic vitrification device: preliminary results with murine and bovine oocytes and embryos. J Assisted Reprod Genet. 2018;35:7:1161-1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1210-9
Templeton A, Morris JK, Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. The Lancet. 1996;348:9039:1402-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05291-9
Ozer G, Akca A, Yuksel B, Duzguner I, Pehlivanli AC, Kahraman S. Prediction of risk factors for first trimester pregnancy loss in frozen-thawed good-quality embryo transfer cycles using machine learning algorithms. J Assisted Reprod Genet. 2022;1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02645-3
Ratna MB, Bhattacharya S, Abdulrahim B, McLernon DJ. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:1:100-116. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez258
Cameron NJ, Bhattacharya S, McLernon DJ. Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst-versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:10:2365-2374. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa186
Marsidi AM, Kipling LM, Kawwass JF, Mehta A. Influence of paternal age on assisted reproductive technology cycles and perinatal outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:2:380-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.033
Xu T, de Figueiredo Veiga A, Hammer KC, Paschalidis IC, Mahalingaiah S. Informative predictors of pregnancy after first IVF cycle using eIVF practice highway electronic health records. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:1:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04814-x
McLernon DJ, Raja EA, Toner JP, Baker VL, Doody KJ, Seifer DB, Sparks AE, Wantman E, Lin PC, Bhattacharya S, Van Voorhis BJ. Predicting personalized cumulative live birth following in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:2:326-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.015
Ratna MB, Bhattacharya S, van Geloven N, McLernon DJ. Predicting cumulative live birth for couples beginning their second complete cycle of in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 2022;37:9:2075-2086. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac152
Paul RC, Fitzgerald O, Lieberman D, Venetis C, Chambers GM. Cumulative live birth rates for women returning to ART treatment for a second ART-conceived child. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:6:1432-1440. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa030
Liu L, Jiao Y, Li X, Ouyang Y, Shi D. Machine learning algorithms to predict early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with fetal heart rate as a strong predictor. Computer Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;196:105624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105624
Grzegorczyk-Martin V, Roset J., Di Pizio P., Fréour T., Barrière P., Pouly J.L., Grynberg M., Parneix I., Avril C., Pacheco J., Grzegorczyk T.M. Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer. J Assisted Reprod Genet. 2022;39:8:1937-1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02547-4
Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Stern JE, Baker VL, Widra E, Coddington CC 3rd, Gibbons WE, Ball GD. A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:3:744-752 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.020
The Univfy PreIVF Report [Internet]. https://www.univfy.com/ivf-success
Outcome Prediction In Subfertility [Internet]. https://w3.abdn.ac.uk/clsm/opis/

Закрыть метаданные